Latest Images

Posterior distributions for the model parameter...

Posterior distributions for the model parameters determined from fitting synthetic data....

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Synthetic data gain phases (top) and visibility...

Synthetic data gain phases (top) and visibility phases (bottom) vs. time for each statio...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Uncalibrated visibility phase vs. time on each ...

Uncalibrated visibility phase vs. time on each of the baselines in the EHT 3C 279 datase...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Same as Figure 3, but showing now the unwrapped...

Same as Figure 3, but showing now the unwrapped visibility phases for a single scan. Not...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Recovered station gain phases vs. time for each...

Recovered station gain phases vs. time for each of the stations participating in the sca...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Calibrated and scan-averaged visibility phase v...

Calibrated and scan-averaged visibility phase vs. time on each of the non-ALMA baselines...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

Posterior distributions for the modeled closure...

Posterior distributions for the modeled closure phases (ψ), when fitting synthetic data ...

Uri Rolls et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure illustrates how observational data ...

This figure illustrates how observational data are partitioned into training and validat...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

(Left) The irradiance profile for a clear day c...

(Left) The irradiance profile for a clear day compared with its monthly template from No...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

(Top) A sample 2D image formed by stacking 100 ...

(Top) A sample 2D image formed by stacking 100 1D-CCCF vectors, resulting in dimensions ...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

(Left) The irradiance profile for a typical cle...

(Left) The irradiance profile for a typical clear-sky day, showing smooth temporal varia...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure shows a Sample 1D-CCCF vector (see ...

This figure shows a Sample 1D-CCCF vector (see Section 3.3) constructed by concatenating...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

(Left) The rolling standard deviation of the ir...

(Left) The rolling standard deviation of the irradiance profile for a clear-sky day, sho...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure illustrates the Gaussian profile fi...

This figure illustrates the Gaussian profile fit to a spectral line, as discussed in Sec...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure illustrates the model’s accuracy an...

This figure illustrates the model’s accuracy and precision for the shuffled data set V1,...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure shows a comparison of the Lomb–Scar...

This figure shows a comparison of the Lomb–Scargle periodogram and machine learning mode...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This plot depicts the relationship between peri...

This plot depicts the relationship between period prediction confidence and accuracy for...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure illustrates a schematic workflow of...

This figure illustrates a schematic workflow of our machine learning pipeline for RV-bas...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure provides a schematic representation...

This figure provides a schematic representation of the generation of temporally shuffled...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure shows the classification accuracy f...

This figure shows the classification accuracy for semi-amplitude predictions in the shuf...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This figure presents the architecture of our Vi...

This figure presents the architecture of our ViT model. Input images are divided into pa...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s p...

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s performance in predicting orbital periods ...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s p...

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s performance in predicting semi-amplitudes ...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

For the ordered data set V3, accuracy and preci...

For the ordered data set V3, accuracy and precision (as described previously in Figure 1...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s p...

This confusion matrix illustrates the model’s performance in predicting orbital periods ...

Anoop Gavankar et al, The Astronomical Journal 171 1

SEARCH TERM(S)

AUTHOR

PUBLICATIONS

  • 736394
  • 144812
  • 92211
  • 73272
  • 14997
  • 2224
  • 1870
  • 598
  • 563
  • 197
  • 128
  • 111
  • 46
  • 32
  • 23
  • 22

YEAR RANGE:

1978
2026

CONTENT TYPE

ADVANCED

ANNOUNCEMENTS

Take the AstroExplorer for a spin!

Be sure to try the search and sorting features, which were added based on user feedback; browse and find the links to videos and interactive figures in our Journal articles; find AAS Research Notes; or notice that new publishers have begun adding their figures to the AIE. Get in touch to hear more!